Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 02:10

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Do you think Japan will have same-sex marriage by 2030?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Chips Ahoy and Oreo maker Mondelez sues grocery chain Aldi over similar packaging - CNN
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is your reaction to the controversial remarks made on YouTube show "India's Got Latent"?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Experiment Reveals What Prolonged Fasting Actually Does to The Human Body - ScienceAlert
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Term Sheet Next: SV Angel alum Steven Lee debuts Seven Stars with $40 million first fund - Fortune
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
More Changes Made To GTA Online In New Updates By Rockstar - RockstarINTEL
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.